What the Creators of 'Sex and the City' Know About Marketing That You Don't
VIEWPOINT: Women Flocked to the Chick Flick Because They Relate to Characters That 'Could Be Me'
By Bonnie Fuller Published: June 09, 2008
|
|
I love the
fact that Sarah Jessica Parker wore a recycled
designer gown to the humongous New York premiere of
"Sex and the City." Not any recycled dress, mind you,
but a silver-lame strapless Nina Ricci gown designed
by über-upscale designer Olivier Theyskens. The same
gazillion-dollar dress already had made appearances
on a socialite at the Metropolitan Museum's Costume
Institute gala and on Lindsay Lohan in Harper's
Bazaar. Mortified, SJP told The New York Times that
it "was short-sighted ... unethical and ...
disappointing" that she had been duped.
What Parker didn't get was that this was exactly what
would have happened to her infamous alter ego, Carrie
Bradshaw. And it's exactly because Carrie has always
had so much of the lovable loser inside her, despite
her label-clad appearance, that she has become such a
hit with women.

'Sex
and the City' stars: The audience's old friends.
Lots has now been written about the tsunami of
success that "Sex and the City" has had, with its
blowout $55.7 million opening weekend -- the biggest
box-office score for a chick flick. But what I think
is really interesting is why women are dressing to
the nines and flocking with droves of friends to see
it and then whooping it up in the theaters.
For "SATC" fans, it's not just about going to see a
movie; it's about attending a special and meaningful
event. At the non-prime-time screening I attended in
a suburban theater, the cheering began with the
credits and rolled through the film, ending in
rousing applause.
The writers who created the film's central character
did a genius thing: They created a woman who real
women could totally identify with -- a truly
authentic female. Carrie wasn't trying to be edgy or
hip. She was a woman who was cute but not too pretty;
funny and smart but not too brainy; great buddies
with her close girlfriends but repeatedly a loser in
love -- so much so that she endured the ultimate
humiliation: being left at the altar. After all,
every woman has experienced devastating heartbreak
even if she hasn't had her wedding abruptly canceled.
Plus there was Carrie's embarrassing habit of
tripping over her designer clothes. Public
embarrassment is another thing most women can relate
to, unfortunately.
The film also won women's allegiance through a factor
not usually valued by marketers who are always on the
outlook for what's next. While it took the lives of
its heroines forward, it triumphed in its celebration
of the familiar. Carrie, Samantha, Charlotte and
Miranda were still the same girlfriends the "SATC"
audience had come to love. After all, the best thing
about a best girlfriend is that you can count on her
not to change, even if it has been four years since
you last saw her.
The "SATC" brand recognizes what many marketers
don't: that women connect with and will follow a
woman or a brand that is friendly, relatable and
likable vs. someone or something that is perfect and
on a pedestal. That is one of the lessons I learned
while revamping Us Weekly or transforming Star from a
tabloid to a glossy magazine.
It wasn't really the glamour or the glitz that made
"Sex and the City" a winner, although they helped;
looking at the fashion in the film was just plain
fun. It was the "she could be me" or "she could be my
best friend"-ness of the Carrie Bradshaw brand that
worked big time. And whether it's movies, TV or print
ads, or a new beauty spokeswoman, there's power in
making a female-focused brand friendly, relatable and
familiar to the masses of women who want to be
welcomed in despite their imperfections and not made
to feel uncool, unedgy and unworthy.
HTML May Not Be Good In Emails
Tanya Irwin is Deputy Editor of MediaPost. She can be reached at tanya@mediapost.com.
| Study: Image-Oriented Emails Not Getting Delivered |
| by Tanya Irwin, Friday, Jun 6, 2008 7:15 AM ET |
| It's
back to the drawing board for marketers,
whose image-oriented email campaigns are
increasingly being blocked by default and Web
mail clients.
That's according to Jeanniey Mullen, Email Experience Council founder and a chief marketing officer at Zinio. The Email Experience Council, the email marketing arm of the Direct Marketing Association (DMA), released "Retail Email Rendering Benchmark Study." The 41-page study examines the email design practices of 104 top online retailers tracked via RetailEmail.Blogspot, and examines their performance in an images-off email environment. It also includes the results of a survey of 472 marketers regarding rendering issues, conducted in conjunction with SubscriberMail, the sponsor of this study. "The results of this study underscore the importance of proactively designing email to compensate for image suppression," said Jordan Ayan, CEO of SubscriberMail, in a statement. "Specifically, email marketers must design emails to work with and without images present and test to ensure optimal image rendering. Marketers whose design accounted for image suppression reported impressive lifts in key performance areas. Still, a significant percent of email marketers realize this issue, yet fail to take action to address it." The study found that 23% of retailers send emails that are completely unintelligible when images are blocked. Of the 77% that sent intelligible emails, there were significant variations in clarity based on their use of HTML text and alt tags. Only 42% of retailers designed emails that were a good mix of HTML text and images, and only 63% of retailers used alt tags on their images adequately or extensively. A marketer's use of HTML text and alt tags are major determinants of the intelligibility of their emails. By optimizing emails for image suppression, double-digit percentage improvements are possible, said Chad White, the eec's director of retail insights and editor at large, founder of RetailEmail.Blogspot, and the study's author. "So there's ample incentive for marketers to follow the leaders and redesign their templates and alter their design processes." Other findings include: •14% of retailers compose their navigation bars with HTML text rather than images. •3% of retailers used HTML call-to-action buttons rather than images. •88% of retailers include a "click to view" link in their preheader text. •63% of retailers include whitelisting instructions in their preheader text. •The emails from only 21% of retailers displayed meaningful snippet text. |
Barna Research On Social Networking and Blogging
Social Networking, Online Entertainment and Church Podcasts
May 26, 2008
(Ventura, CA) When the Internet clicked into the public consciousness more than a decade ago, experts debated its usefulness and staying power. Now, few would argue that mobile devices and online technology have become deeply embedded in society. Millions of Americans have become dependent upon the new digital conveniences that provide them with entertainment, information, products, and content. The impact of these technologies on interpersonal relationships - a domain often called social networking - has begun to rewire the way people meet, express themselves, and stay connected.
A new study from The Barna Group explores social networking as well as how Americans use digital technology to get the products, services, and content they desire. The research identifies the mainstream - as well as emerging - platforms and practices. Additionally, the Barna study also examines how the Christian community engages with such technologies, including the use of church podcasts.
Electronic Communication
A cultural novelty a mere 15 years ago, email has become an essential part of culture and commerce. Currently, nearly four out of five Americans (78%) who access a computer have sent an email in the past week. As proof of its mainstream status, computer users over the age of 50 are just as likely as younger adults to use email.
By contrast, text messaging and instant messaging (IM) are used by smaller, though devoted segments of the population. One-third of computer users (33%) have used IM in the past week, while 30% of Americans have sent someone a text message via a mobile telephone. One of the reasons younger adults email rates are merely "average" compared to older residents is the younger set's heavy reliance on IM'ing and texting to stay connected.
Facebook, MySpace and the Blogosphere
The Internet helps individuals express themselves. Millions of Americans have taken advantage of this, launching personal websites and blogs (short for "weblogs"). While these personal venues for self-expression have become a significant feature of the online landscape, most Americans remain on the digital sidelines: just one-quarter of computer users (23%) has a personal webpage or home page on a social networking site (such as Facebook or MySpace).
Even fewer adults have a personal blog where they communicate their ideas and experiences (10% of Americans with regular access to a computer). Interestingly, an even higher proportion of computer users (14%) had posted a comment on another person's blog in the last week.
Blogging has not reached the "tipping point" towards becoming a mainstream activity (an emerging technology is often thought to "tip" toward majority use when the penetration reaches 20% or more of the population). Still, there are an estimated 16 million American adults who use their blog as a pulpit to broadcast their voice to the world. Blogs are most common among single adults, Northeast residents, homosexuals, those not registered to vote, and atheists and agnostics.
One other insight related to blogs is the sheer devotion many bloggers find in the pursuit, rarely letting their online journals grow dark. More than seven out of 10 people who have a blog update the online journal at least once a week.
Finding Information, Content and Entertainment
Not surprisingly, the promise of the Internet - instant access to ubiquitous information - is not lost on Americans. Searching for information or content is easily the most common online activity of the 15 assessed in the study. In all, more than eight out of 10 computer users had snapped up information via the Web in the last week (84%).
Compared to online search habits, a less common activity is online purchasing. Still, the Internet has become a viable and widely used retail channel, tallying one-quarter of computer users (27%) who have completed an online purchase in the last week.
With more people than ever using high-speed connections, watching online videos has also become an important feature of the inter-connected digital world. Overall, one-quarter of computer users (26%) reported watching a video via the Internet in the previous seven days. This was twice as common as downloading music in the past week (13% of users).
Two of the activities examined were rarely undertaken by Americans. As yet, downloading movies is still a limited activity among computer users (just 2% in the past week). Also, just 4% of adults admitted to viewing pornography or adult content in the last week.
The Socially Networked Church
People within the Christian community are just as immersed in (and dependent upon) digital technologies and social networks as are those outside of it. Both evangelical Christians and other born again Christians emerged as statistically on par with national norms when it came to each of the 15 different areas that were studied. In other words, matters of faith played very little role in differentiating people's technological habits.
One exception was access to spiritual content via podcasting, which not surprisingly found a more eager audience among Christians than non-Christians. The study found that 38% of evangelicals and 31% of other born again Christians had listened to a sermon or church teaching via digital recordings available on the Internet (often called a "podcast"), compared with 17% of other adults. In macro-terms, an enormous audience of roughly 45 million Americans reports going digital to acquire church sermon and teaching content. In all, one out of every four adults - 23% - said they downloaded a church podcast in the past week.
The profile of people who had listened to sermon podcasts cut across generational lines, with older adults just as likely as young residents to listen in. Residents of the South (31%) were twice as likely as those in the Northeast (14%) to access church podcasts. Similarly, Protestants (32%) were more intrigued by such content than were Catholics (18%) and the same held true for non-mainline attenders (38%) compared to mainline Protestants (16%). African-Americans (50%) were very loyal listeners, especially when contrasted with Asians (14%). Furthermore, those who are economically downscale (35%) were more likely to listen to church podcasts than were upscale adults (10%).
Subgroup Insights
The analysis of differing demographic and psychographic groups provided several intriguing patterns:
* Political liberals were among the most active users of technologies. They were more likely than the norm to have a personal homepage, to maintain a blog, to post comments on other people's blogs, and to watch online videos as well as above average in their use of search, texting, and email.
* Generally, never-married adults were more likely than married adults to rely on social network technologies. However, the one exception to this pattern was among parents of children under 18. The tech gap between parents and singles was much narrower when it came to use of texting, downloading music, and IM'ing. Perhaps parents pursue these areas more aggressively to keep up with their technologically hyper-active children.
* The technology gaps by generation were impressive. The researchers categorized "mainstream" technology as those used by 50% or more of the population, while "emerging" technology represented penetration of 20% to less than half. Among Elders (ages 62+), two out of the 15 areas were deemed mainstream (email and search), while another two domains were emerging (IM and online purchases). Boomers (ages 43 to 61) had two mainstream categories and four emerging areas. Busters (ages 24 to 42) had four mainstream and four emerging technologies. The nation's youngest adults, Mosaics who are 23 and under, were easily the furthest along in their adoption of these technologies. Mosaics had eight mainstream categories and another three deemed to be emerging. In other words, out of the 15 areas of technology assessed in the research, Elders widely embraced or were becoming comfortable with four, Boomers with six, Busters with eight, and Mosaics with 11.
Technology Influence?
The research was given context by David Kinnaman, the lead researcher on the project. "Church leaders have to strike the delicate balance between the spiritual and cultural potential of tech tools without surrendering to the false promise of these tools. Having the means of reaching the masses - for instance, through podcasting - is a good thing. Yet, nothing matches the potency of life-on-life discipleship. In this respect, social networking and blogs can be effective tools to intimately connect with a small, natural network of relationships. The key is using the technology to in a way that is consistent with your calling and purpose, not just an addictive self-indulgence."
Kinnaman, the president of The Barna Group, also pointed out the need for a more intentional and broad discussion within the Church about how technology shapes its users. "One recent study we completed among teenagers showed that just 9% of church-going teens had learned something helpful about technology in their church during the past year. As each new generation becomes increasingly enmeshed with technology, these discussions and choices cannot be left to chance. Control, image, relevance, immediacy, transparency, purity, truth, stewardship, and escapism are some of the many issues that technology brings to the surface, not always with benign consequences.
"On the positive side, however, technology can empower and engage people, across generations, socio-economic segments, and physical boundaries. Young people, for instance, think of themselves as creators of content, not merely consumers of it. Technology, in essence, gives them a voice and fuels their search for calling. Whether or not you welcome it, technology creates an entirely new calculus of influence and independence. The stewardship of technology as a force for good in culture is an important role for technologists, entrepreneurs, educators, and Christian leaders."
About the Research
This report is based upon two nationwide telephone surveys conducted by The Barna Group with random samples of adults, age 18 and older. These surveys were conducted in July-August 2007 and December 2007. The August survey involved interviews with 1000 adults; the December survey included 1005 adults. The maximum margin of sampling error associated with the aggregate sample for each of those surveys is ±3.2 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. Statistical weighting was used to calibrate the sample to known population percentages in relation to demographic variables.
"Born again Christians" are defined as people who said they have made a personal commitment to Jesus Christ that is still important in their life today and who also indicated they believe that when they die they will go to Heaven because they had confessed their sins and had accepted Jesus Christ as their savior. Respondents are not asked to describe themselves as "born again."
"Evangelicals" meet the born again criteria (described above) plus seven other conditions. Those include saying their faith is very important in their life today; believing they have a personal responsibility to share their religious beliefs about Christ with non-Christians; believing that Satan exists; believing that eternal salvation is possible only through grace, not works; believing that Jesus Christ lived a sinless life on earth; asserting that the Bible is accurate in all that it teaches; and describing God as the all-knowing, all-powerful, perfect deity who created the universe and still rules it today. Being classified as an evangelical is not dependent upon church attendance or the denominational affiliation of the church attended. Respondents were not asked to describe themselves as "evangelical."
"Downscale" adults were defined as those who did not attend college and whose annual, pre-tax household income is $20,000 or less.
"Upscale" adults are people who have completed a four-year degree and whose annual, pre-tax income exceeds $60,000.
The Barna Group, Ltd. (which includes its research division, The Barna Research Group) conducts primary research, produces media resources pertaining to spiritual development, and facilitates the healthy spiritual growth of leaders, children, families and Christian ministries. Located in Ventura, California, Barna has been conducting and analyzing primary research to understand cultural trends related to values, beliefs, attitudes and behaviors since 1984. If you would like to receive free e-mail notification of the release of each new, bi-monthly update on the latest research findings from The Barna Group, you may subscribe to this free service at the Barna website www.barna.org <<span style="color:#0950ad; ">http://www.barna.org/> .
Email Analytics Reveal Sweet Spots In Subject-Line Length
| Email Analytics Reveal Sweet Spots In Subject-Line Length |
| by David Goetzl, Tuesday, May 27, 2008 7:00 AM ET |
| CAPTIVA
ISLAND, Fla. -- Email marketing analytics
have led Dela Quist, CEO of London shop
Alchemy Worx, to discover a sweet spot for
how long subject lines should be.
He says open rates climb when the subject lines are in the 50-character range or 80-character range. But, perhaps counterintuitively, they fall in the middle when the length is 60 or 70. The magnetic Quist gave the keynote address Saturday at MediaPost's Email Insiders Summit conference: "Emailing People Not Lists: Using Customer Based Metrics to Drive Performance Improvement." Research culled from 250 million messages sent over the past two years, with 660 different subject lines, has led him to believe that a 50-character subject line touting a "powerful" offer is appealing (30% off Spring Getaway flights to Florida on Delta). And a longer 80-character-plus line describing a newsletter in enticing fashion works (Find out Secrets to Spice up your Barbecue this weekend and all Summer Long and enter to win a New Weber Grill.) Somehow, in the 60- to-70-character middle, he says, the subject line is either too long or not long enough. Quist has various theories, but one is that the longer the subject line, the better chance a marketer has of presenting different concepts that may appeal to different consumers and boosting open rates. So in the above example, some may be interested in the ways to improve their grilling, while others would seek the new grill, leading to higher open rates. Quist's research--his clients include PayPal and Intercontinental Hotels in the U.S.--showing that "long subject lines work better" goes against conventional wisdom, he said. "Our experience tended towards the belief that long subject lines work better," he said. (The longer the better goes against conventional wisdom.) A more descriptive subject line can also build goodwill with consumers, since it can provide enough info to easily either turn them on or turn them off. |
From Brandweek.com: M&M Co-Authors With Consumers

May 22, 2008
By Mike Beirne
Mars Snackfood USA just got even more personal with its customized candy business by allowing consumers to print faces on M&M's.
The move marks the launch of M&M's Faces. Starting next month, consumers can visit MyMMs.com, upload a photo and order a batch of M&M's with a face and personal message printed on the candy shell. The leading chocolate brand announced the news at the National Confectioners Association All Candy Expo this week. TV, print and digital will support.
"I think this is the biggest idea at this show," said Jim Cass, vp and gm of Mars Direct, which manages My M&M's and My Dove brands. "There's nothing more personal that you could put on anything than your face."
Where other marketers may be reticent to let go of the reins of a top brand, Mars has a heritage of allowing consumers to define M&M's. In a 1995 promotion, consumers voted blue to be the next M&M color. Last year, Mars launched the My Inner M&M effort that directed consumers to create their own animated M&M's character on BecomeAnMM.com.
"The consumers aren't recreating the brand, they enhance it," said Cass. "The brand essence is fun, and they simply redefine that."
My M&M's brand initially handled messages for birthdays, holidays and special events such as weddings and graduations. Since its inception, the customized candy business has sold 1 million bags of personalized candy, which costs about $9 a pound, not including the cost of packaging that the customer selects.
Consumer orders is still the biggest source of revenue for Mars Direct, but businesses have became the division's fastest growing source of orders since the division began printing company logos last year, said Cass. The unit also began printing the logos of Major League Baseball teams.
Printing personalized messages on M&M's started as a small R&D project during late 2004. The pieces caught the eye of a senior executive who urged testing whether the printed product would sell online. After six months of selling about eight bags of personalized candy a week, orders eventually grew to a point where the Hackettstown, N.J.-based company decided to add more manufacturing capacity dedicated to making M&M's for the personalized candy business.
Idol TV Ratings Drop
| 'Idol' Ratings Drop, But Fox Up About Its Prospects |
| by David Goetzl, Friday, May 16, 2008 7:45 AM ET |
| Fox
officials attribute "American Idol's" ratings
drops this year--including an all-time low
May 6--to a range of factors. But that hasn't
stopped top executives from saying they are
committed to revivifying it next year.
|

Peter Liguori, Fox's entertainment chairman, said Thursday that a creative analysis needs to take place, but "both the network and the producers really want to ... see what we can do to inject it with new levels of energy and new unpredictable twists and turns, and greater levels of storytelling."
Liguori's dissatisfaction marks the second season in a row in which executives have found themselves missing the lightning rods that powered the show over its first five seasons. Last year, Rupert Murdoch, the head of Fox parent News Corp., said the show suffered from a lack of charismatic, magnetic "characters" it entertained in the past.
(One area Liguori said was not a ratings factor this season was offbeat behavior from judge Paula Abdul, although no change would be made. "We love Paula; she's coming back," he said.)
But Liguori said on a call to announce Fox's schedule for next season that "Idol"--as with most reality shows--allows for flexibility to "re-set the table" with format and other executions. "We do constantly want to make the show the most relevant zeitgeisty show on TV," he said.
ALthough serialized dramas seem to have suffered the most, due to viewer defections post-writers' strike, Liguori said "Idol" may also be impacted. "I do think the show has somewhat suffered by the post-strike malaise of folks watching broadcast TV," he said.
Executives also allowed that shows naturally go through a wax-wane experience; as seasons go forward, viewer interest lessens.
In the 18-to-49 demo, "Idol" ratings for the Tuesday edition this season are down nearly a rating point, from a 12.2 in 2007 to an 11.3. (The numbers include DVR viewing.) Wednesday ratings have suffered more dramatically, falling from a 12.4 to a 10.7.
Both shows last year averaged more than 30 million total viewers--an inflection point in network TV. This year, however, they are below the threshold. On Tuesday, May 6, the show suffered its worst rating since season one (2002), with an 8.4 in 18-to-49 "live plus same day" numbers.
Fox's contract with "Idol" producers gives it the option to continue airing the show through 2011--likely a no-brainer. The network pays a per-episode license fee to producers 19 Entertainment and FremantleMedia, which increases each season. There are also provisions in the contract in which Fox pays bonus fees, based on ratings performances and the number of episodes produced.
Fox pays the contracts of the show's host and three judges.
Raised On The Radio by Steve Smith , Tuesday, May 6, 2008 ANYONE ELSE REMEMBER A TIME when radio DJs were not all super-caffeinated -- but nicely anesthetized? The need to fill air time with fast-paced chatter is so profound now that drive-time shows seem to require a trio in the studio and "Wayne, Our Eye Guy in the Sky" playing the straight man. Maybe I was spoiled by '70s FM rock. Even NPR seems a bit too chipper for me. Back in the day, I remember when we kept our DJs well stoned and searching minutes for the next word. "That was.....Leon Russell...Lavender.......................Blue." Personally, nowadays, I wouldn't mind if Fresh Air's Terry Gross took a couple of hits before air time. And so I am not the best guy to judge radio or radio audiences, but I am intrigued by some of the ways that stations are embracing SMS -- both as a promotional tool and as a way to build community. A Portland, Maine station, Citadel's WJBQ had its second annual "Q Baby Idol" contest, which had people email in their cutest baby pictures and asked listeners to vote by email and SMS on the winner. According to promotions director Tim Moore, "last year we had over 400,000 emails and 231,000 text votes. This year we had 904,000 texts and 250,000 emails." Not only are the volumes of text votes enormous (i.e. potential ad space in the response text messages) but the supplanting of email with SMS is noteworthy. Moore says that for his younger listeners, email is passé. "I have an email database of about 12,000, and response to it is fantastic, but it is all in the upper demos, not teens." He expects the text database soon to outpace his email community. "One station spent 12 years building an email list to 25,000. We were at 50% of that community in six months," says Martin Kristiseter, founder and executive vice president, mSnap, which powers text programs at WJBQ and hundreds of other stations around the U.S. MSnap provides a platform to radio stations for free and retains the right to the traffic for in-text ads and cross-promoting to mobile content. It shares learnings and templates across the network. Contests like free concert tickets and private concerts for a winning high school can generate phenomenal SMS volumes. Whether through double opt-in or through an over-air disclaimer when they are prompted to text in, the users are converted into SMS community members. For an Atlanta country station, the offer of a private concert by Kellie Pickler led to a war among high schools and over 2 million texts in about nine days of promotion. Because so many SMS users are voting serially, the actual number of community sign-ups resulting from these campaigns is a fraction of the SMS volume. But still, Kristiseter says that only about 20% drop out of a radio SMS community when an on-air disclaimer is used, and less than 10% drop out when they sign up via a double opt-in. In essence the promotion kick starts the community, which then can be leveraged in many ways. The SMS database is a lot more flexible for certain things. For instance, a radio station can use it for a kind of "stealth marketing" when a DJ is broadcasting from a local merchant. Moore says that the over-air prompts to "come on down" to an auto dealership may not work very well all the time. But if the DJ brings along 50 CDs and then hits only your list of opted-in SMS club members with an offer of free CDs to the first 50 visitors, suddenly a crowd shows up. "It is a great marketing tool for the station and it glides under the radar," he says. During ratings periods, Moore can hit his club on the Thursday survey day with a contest offer to tune in and win when they hear a secret word mentioned on air. Instant audience. Radio has a unique hold on the people who are loyal to it, and so the medium offers a special kind of fit with SMS response. It is a lot cheaper than TV for running a prompt, and the text-in message can run throughout the day. Kristiseter says that in comparisons of the effectiveness of various media acting as triggers for SMS response, outdoor advertising and radio were among the most successful, but they work at different rates. Outdoor promotions take several months to achieve the same response rate as a single week of radio mentions. TV and radio both perform well, but TV is much more expensive. Of course, being a trusted correspondent in a consumer's SMS ring is an invitation for abuse. As brands get closer to users, the need for restraint becomes greater. Two to four SMS messages a month from a text "club" seems to be the accepted norm lately, unless the subscription is to text alerts that you expect with greater frequency. I have always said that mobile media is going to press some of our own rhetoric about wanting "relationships" with consumers. Are brands really ready to trade value for attention?
by Steve Smith , Tuesday, May 6, 2008
ANYONE ELSE REMEMBER A TIME when radio DJs were not all super-caffeinated -- but nicely anesthetized? The need to fill air time with fast-paced chatter is so profound now that drive-time shows seem to require a trio in the studio and "Wayne, Our Eye Guy in the Sky" playing the straight man. Maybe I was spoiled by '70s FM rock. Even NPR seems a bit too chipper for me. Back in the day, I remember when we kept our DJs well stoned and searching minutes for the next word. "That was.....Leon Russell...Lavender.......................Blue." Personally, nowadays, I wouldn't mind if Fresh Air's Terry Gross took a couple of hits before air time.
And so I am not the best guy to judge radio or radio audiences, but I am intrigued by some of the ways that stations are embracing SMS -- both as a promotional tool and as a way to build community. A Portland, Maine station, Citadel's WJBQ had its second annual "Q Baby Idol" contest, which had people email in their cutest baby pictures and asked listeners to vote by email and SMS on the winner. According to promotions director Tim Moore, "last year we had over 400,000 emails and 231,000 text votes. This year we had 904,000 texts and 250,000 emails." Not only are the volumes of text votes enormous (i.e. potential ad space in the response text messages) but the supplanting of email with SMS is noteworthy.
Moore says that for his younger listeners, email is passé. "I have an email database of about 12,000, and response to it is fantastic, but it is all in the upper demos, not teens." He expects the text database soon to outpace his email community.
"One station spent 12 years building an email list to 25,000. We were at 50% of that community in six months," says Martin Kristiseter, founder and executive vice president, mSnap, which powers text programs at WJBQ and hundreds of other stations around the U.S. MSnap provides a platform to radio stations for free and retains the right to the traffic for in-text ads and cross-promoting to mobile content. It shares learnings and templates across the network.
Contests like free concert tickets and private concerts for a winning high school can generate phenomenal SMS volumes. Whether through double opt-in or through an over-air disclaimer when they are prompted to text in, the users are converted into SMS community members.
For an Atlanta country station, the offer of a private concert by Kellie Pickler led to a war among high schools and over 2 million texts in about nine days of promotion. Because so many SMS users are voting serially, the actual number of community sign-ups resulting from these campaigns is a fraction of the SMS volume. But still, Kristiseter says that only about 20% drop out of a radio SMS community when an on-air disclaimer is used, and less than 10% drop out when they sign up via a double opt-in. In essence the promotion kick starts the community, which then can be leveraged in many ways.
The SMS database is a lot more flexible for certain things. For instance, a radio station can use it for a kind of "stealth marketing" when a DJ is broadcasting from a local merchant. Moore says that the over-air prompts to "come on down" to an auto dealership may not work very well all the time. But if the DJ brings along 50 CDs and then hits only your list of opted-in SMS club members with an offer of free CDs to the first 50 visitors, suddenly a crowd shows up. "It is a great marketing tool for the station and it glides under the radar," he says.
During ratings periods, Moore can hit his club on the Thursday survey day with a contest offer to tune in and win when they hear a secret word mentioned on air. Instant audience.
Radio has a unique hold on the people who are loyal to it, and so the medium offers a special kind of fit with SMS response. It is a lot cheaper than TV for running a prompt, and the text-in message can run throughout the day. Kristiseter says that in comparisons of the effectiveness of various media acting as triggers for SMS response, outdoor advertising and radio were among the most successful, but they work at different rates. Outdoor promotions take several months to achieve the same response rate as a single week of radio mentions. TV and radio both perform well, but TV is much more expensive.
Of course, being a trusted correspondent in a consumer's SMS ring is an invitation for abuse. As brands get closer to users, the need for restraint becomes greater. Two to four SMS messages a month from a text "club" seems to be the accepted norm lately, unless the subscription is to text alerts that you expect with greater frequency. I have always said that mobile media is going to press some of our own rhetoric about wanting "relationships" with consumers. Are brands really ready to trade value for attention?
As for me, I am not sure SMS would fit any of my favorite laconic DJs of yesteryear. This clearly is a medium made for the radio of 2008, not 1974. The potheads at WNEW-FM in New York would space out on the shortcode before they even got to the end of the prompt. "That was Foghat before that three hour set of King Crimson. Just remember...to get your free Emerson Lake...and Palmer tickets for...the Garden show...just text in 'Hoedown' to...to.......well, wherever you texted to last time for the Yes shows."
Marketing To Moms
Step out of the 'Mommy' Mentality and Find Out Who They Really Are
By Marti Barletta Published: May 07, 2008
Mother's Day is a wonderful time for marketers to talk to moms. After all, mothers are the chief purchasing officers, or CPOs, of their households, making almost all of the spending decisions. From computers to cars, from airlines to appliances, from home improvement to high-definition TVs, women -- the majority of whom are moms -- make 85% of all household purchase decisions in the U.S. Smart marketers can't afford to ignore the power of mom's purse. New media is all the rage these days, and there are several vehicles that are doing a great job of leveraging the power of marketing to moms. Here are some examples:

The TrendSight Group, a think tank specializing in marketing to women, and a founding member of the distinguished Women Gurus Network.
| Marti Barletta helps companies get smart about women. She is the recognized thought leader on marketing to women and author of the new and highly acclaimed "PrimeTime Women: How to Win the Hearts, Minds and Business of Boomer Big Spenders," (January 2007). Her trendsetting book, "Marketing to Women," is in its second edition and has been published in more than 15 languages. She is CEO of |
Motherproof.com is a fabulous site that, in its own words, "is on a never-ending quest for your quintessential mom-mobile. ... We want a car that's easy to load kids into and has seats that hide baby vomit, but will also make us feel sexy and modern while driving it. Oh yeah, if it could also bring about world peace and end hunger, that would be a bonus." In terms of marketing presence, there is obviously car advertising, but also a great "seal of approval" section listing products that help "nourish, inform, organize, clean and keep safe" all mothers and families on the road.
CafeMom.com is the largest and fastest-growing social-networking site for moms on the web, with 1 million members. Moms have created more than 35,000 groups on CafeMom.com for everything from cooking to autism to working at home to raising boys to getting tattoos. CafeMom also prides itself on providing added-value sponsorship programs that allow brands to realistically join the conversation, and blue chip brands such as P&G, Walmart, Kraft and Sony have heeded CafeMom's call.
Alaska mom Michelle Mitchell has created a custom search engine, scribbit.blogspot.com, powered by Google, for perusing parenting related blogs. It can search over 1,500 blogs for everything from "kids birthday party ideas" at alphamom.com to "spring cleaning" tips from momadvice.com. What a time saver and great way to get up-to-the-minute advice from all "the girls." I didn't see much advertising or marketing on this site, but I guarantee it will be there soon.
I've also run across a couple of interesting Mother's Day new-media marketing initiatives: JVC is sponsoring a "Here's Looking at Me" Mother's Day video contest where participants can create their own "Thanks, mom" video, upload it to the JVC contest website, and e-mail a link to share the love with mom. Participants will also be entered to win a new video camera. JVC not only is tapping into Mother's Day as a way to reach the CPOs of the family, but they are also leveraging the younger generation's propensity to "do" new media.
BlogHer.com, a guide to blogs by women, recently challenged its members by asking "How many lives can we save with donations from the BlogHer community between now and Mother's Day, May 11, 2008?" It encourages members to download a Global Giving widget that drives other readers to donate to the cause of improving maternal health by supplying health care, birthing kits, education, meals and much more to women in need.
Marketing to moms makes sense, but beware these common mistakes: Don't assume "mom" is the only aspect of their lives that women with children can relate to. In fact, moms are multidimensional, and when they are in work mode, exercise mode or planning a girlfriends' getaway, the "mom" mind-set is not where their heads are.
Don't assume moms have all the money. In a way, they do; 84% of women over 40 have kids -- ergo, they are mothers. But the real driver of women's spending power kicks in when they are less involved with their kids, not throwing all their dough into diapers and formula. Don't assume moms all have toddlers in the home. Most marketers are thinking in terms of babies and younger kids but only 3.5% of women bear children each year, so that's a pretty limited target audience. And the fact is, most of the household's major baby spending is concentrated around the birth of the first child, making the niche even smaller.
One thing that surprises me is the dearth of content, info, forums, social networking and blogs oriented around the needs and concerns of moms of teens. The difficulties of adolescents are at least as bad as the tantrums of toddlers, and often with far more dire consequences. Yet no one is making it their business to reach out to this under-served and over-stressed segment.
All that said, Happy Mother's Day. If you are going after moms, make the most of the many ways to connect with them. But don't make the mistake of using stereotypical "mommy marketing."
10 Steps To Success WIth Online Viral
There are no guarantees when it comes to planning a viral marketing campaign, but that doesn't mean there's nothing you can do to improve your chances of success.
Here are 10 things to keep in mind when it's time to begin your next project.
1) It's all about the creative idea. Just like Hollywood movies and video games, which live or die based on consumer affinities, the success of an online viral campaign hinges on an intangible "secret sauce": the ability to entertain, inspire, and engage a mass audience. When embarking on a viral campaign, run your concepts by your professional colleagues and your non-industry friends. Make sure it's easy to communicate, entertaining, and captures their imagination. Is it high concept enough to attain mass appeal?
2) Viral outbreaks don't happen by following a formula. Viral campaigns need to capture users' attention in an innovative, often unorthodox, way.
3) Personalization is key. It has been repeatedly proven that online, one-to-one communication is more effective than one-to-many. The value of a personal message (with my picture, voice, or text) is much higher than that of a generic communication. The most successful online viral campaigns, and literally every engineered viral outbreak since the dancing baby in 1996, are driven by an application that allows users to personalize and share their message. Simply put, the applications at the center of successful viral campaigns are first and foremost a means to facilitate user communication.
4) Keep it simple: Simple to understand, simple to personalize, and simple to share Don't ask the users to do too much. Good, streamlined UI goes a long way. Let your parents test the application during beta; if they can't figure it out, it's time to simplify. A clear call to action helps. Encapsulate this simplicity and the call to action with a good name.
5) Leverage existing brand equity. If you have a popular brand asset, take advantage of it. A different agency or corporate division often controls the asset, mascot, or spokesperson you want to leverage, but it's worth getting higher-ups involved in securing them. Consumer recognition and affinity can only help when you're trying to get users involved. You're also looking after the best interests of the brand as a whole: consistent, integrated marketing across platforms.
6) Nobody wants to be marketed to. Consumer perception is one of value, not of blatant brand advertising. While open rates on corporate communications to end-users average only 15%, user-generated viral campaigns average over 65%. It's communication from a friend, and most recipients will open it. Let the users market for you and don't flaunt the brand. Keep it authentic and keep it useful.
7) Users don't want to work hard. The best applications require very little creative input (or talent, for that matter). Users can "create" a well-produced piece of media by making a simple choice, inputting a word, or uploading a file. If the beginning and the end are properly produced, and the rules by which the users contribute are well-planned, very little user talent is required to create an effective piece of personalized media.
8) Get all your people involved. Brainstorm openly with your marketing and advertising folks and think outside the box. No idea is too crazy. Have your smart technology folks participate in the brainstorm so they can introduce new dimensions to the concept: it is, after all, an interactive/media technology campaign you're planning. Get your boss(es) involved so they're inspired to take creative risks and don't shoot down your crazy idea.
9) Execute with love. A strong concept has a way of inspiring everyone on the team. There is additional magic to be created by those who "merely" execute, so spend time with the execution team and listen to them. If there are holes in your concept, they'll be the first to know and it is they who can do something about it. Inspire the execution team and allow them some room to improve and innovate during execution. Surprise users with aesthetics: texture, movement, and detail that go the extra mile.
10) Deliver ROI. There are two main things to watch. First, make sure the goal of the campaign--whether brand exposure, conversion, or lead generation--is clear from day one. From concept to execution, and reflected in the UI, make sure you're setting the stage for achieving your goal. Second, seed the campaign with good traffic. If you build it, they will not necessarily come. Give your app the best chance for success by crafting a strategy for how users will initially hear about it. Even the best Hollywood movie needs to get the initial word out. Plan to do so for your viral campaign.
The most effective tactics include providing access to it from the brand's home page (there's no better group to spread the word for you), including it in your newsletters, having the top brass at the brand, agency and even vendor(s) proudly send it to all their employees and contacts, and doing basic PR. Note that these four methods are all grassroots and do not need to include huge media buys. It's also best to do them for a period of time, not just on launch.
Sideman is the CEO of Oddcast. Oddcast is the developer and distributor of speaking avatar products for enterprise (www.oddcast.com) and small and medium businesses (www.sitepal.com) as well as the consumer (www.voki.com) marketplace.
